Is Vaping Health Risky?
Is Vaping Health Risky?
The writer examines the possible social and health advantages of adolescent smoking, while also considering potential harm. She refers to e-cigarettes as electric cigarettes but calls them a tobacco product. The authors explore the different possibilities for teens in light of the fact that smoking has become a socially unacceptable behavior. She argues that people should think about the social norms that promote smoking to teens, while also taking into consideration the dangers of nicotine addiction. The author also examines the difference between teenage smoking and adult smoking. After reviewing the literature, I trust her that e-cigarette vaporizers certainly are a harmless option to smoking, if used correctly.
The majority of the data on smoking and its own risks comes from adults, which makes it hard to assess how the risks are reduced by e-smoking. It’s estimated that approximately fourteen thousand deaths every year are due to smoking. This figure is likely an underestimation, because so many deaths may be the consequence of second hand smoke. In addition, it assumes that people who smoke don’t intend to do so.
The author suggests that we should think about the fact that e-cigarettes mimic the result of tobacco products, while providing a far less harmful experience. The problem with this approach is that it treats all smoking as dangerous, though it isn’t. Many people don’t realize how similar the taste of a cigarette to a vaporizer, or how similar the physical act of smoking would be to smoking. Furthermore, it presumes that people who utilize the cigarettes aren’t taking any real risks. The argument that originates from that is that because e smokers don’t feel any of the physical effects of smoking, they can not be deemed to be causing these deaths, when they are.
However, it is critical to remember that smoking and using vaporizers are both very similar behaviors. Why is vaporizing unique is that it allows a smoker to achieve the same effect as smoking, minus the associated risks. Vaporizing offers a highly similar experience as smoking. This means that vapers may be increasing their chances of quitting the habit. In addition, it means that they are taking steps in direction of protecting their health while simultaneously increasing the chance of enjoying a healthier lifestyle.
The writer makes some valid points about the dangers of smoking. He also makes some valid criticisms of having less nicotine, and of the dangers of carbon monoxide smoke. However, his real issue is among regulation. He argues that e-cigarette companies must not be permitted to advertise their products as safe when all they have done is increase the level of chemicals and additives which are present in traditional cigarettes. The problem with this argument is that people have already seen the unwanted effects of increased levels of these chemicals in traditional cigarettes.
We already have countless reports about the negative side effects of nicotine, especially in smokers attempting to quit. We already have plenty of stories concerning the rise of cancers and respiratory problems due to long-term nicotine use. It’s true that e-cigs don’t contain any nicotine, but that hasn’t stopped them from being advertised as a cure-all for smoking. E Cigarettes have certainly been an important factor in the spike in smoking-related deaths in the last few years.
The writer does not appear to recognize the irony of arguing against smoking through a healthier alternative, but doesn’t appear to consider the potential negative health effects of his product either. He also discounts the idea that smokers who switch to the cigarettes will eventually turn back to cigarette smoking. He appears to think that all we have to do to beat cigarettes would be to reduce the level of nicotine we take in. The truth is that smokers who try to quit often do so due to other medical issues, and aren’t just embracing the cigarettes to get away from their bad habits. There are lots of reasons why people smoke. The author has basically ignored all of them in his arguments against vaping.
While it holds true that the cigarettes usually do not contain any real tobacco, some of the chemicals found in using tobacco are located in the smokes. The author seems to be of the belief that all we have to do to solve the problem of smoking is to reduce the amount of chemicals podsmall.com we ingest through our lungs. The argument he presents is merely not based in sound scientific fact. There is no real proof that reducing the volume of chemicals we ingest improves anything other than our health. The author also discounts the theory that the cigarettes are less hazardous than regular cigarettes since they don’t contain the harmful chemicals found in regular cigarettes.